Blurb on the text from: Smit, David. “The Wishful Fantasy of ‘What Maisie Knew.’” American Literary Realism, 1870-1910 29.3 (Spring, 1997): 1-14.
There
is a wishful fantasy at the core of What
Maisie Knew that counts on the resources of the imagination…to make the
weak strong and the vulnerable invincible.
Merla
Wolk is right, I think. In What Maisie
Knew, Henry James does not confront directly the implications of the main
premise of his novel: whether a girl with a great deal of imagination and the
potential for a high moral sensibility can transcend her corrupt environment by
the sheer exercise of her imagination and moral sensibility. It takes a leap of
the imagination to believe that Maisie’s fine sensibilities could develop in
such a corrupt moral atmosphere in the first place, but on this matter we may
willfully suspend our disbelief and grant James his donnée: his interest in Maisie as “a small expanding center of
consciousness” and “register of impressions” who would not submit to “the
inherited tie and the imposed complication” of her familial circumstances but
who would “create, without design, quite fresh elements of this order – contribute,
that is, to the formation of a fresh tie, from which it would then (and for all
the world as if through a small demonic foresight) proceed to derive great
profit.”
However,
by concentrating on Maisie’s developing consciousness, James finesses the
larger social and legal context of her choice and what the consequences of her
choice may be. In doing so, he has given tacit permission to critics to
explore Maisie’s final choice to go off with Mrs. Wix, as if it occurred in a
social and cultural vacuum, untouched by the realities of London in the 1890s,
a London of sweat shops and law courts, of child labor and social turmoil over
the rights of women and children in a patriarchal society. I would argue from
the evidence of his notebooks that James was aware of Maisie’s legal situation,
and for a while considered it to be the focus of the novel. Gradually, however,
his interest evolved toward Maisie’s consciousness, and his interest in the
social and legal issues dropped out of the foreground. Nevertheless, these
issues continue to hover in the background of the novel as part of what James
assumed his readers in the 1890s would have understood about Maisie’s
situation, and we ought to consider social and legal issues when we weigh the
degree of Maisie’s moral development and especially her freedom. If we do take
Maisie’s social and legal situation seriously, we may see that her final choice
to go off with Mrs. Wix is severely constrained and that if that choice is
based primarily on moral considerations, it is tragic.
No comments:
Post a Comment